Sexuality and disability is a topic often researched and discussed in the broad field of rehabilitation, but the literature often focuses on the medical aspects of sexuality and disability, speaking more to sexual functioning. Many studies have focused on sexuality as it pertains to specific client populations, including clients who have sustained spinal cord injuries (Singh 2005), (Liebowitz 2005, 2007), clients with intellectual disabilities (Wolfe 1997), (Cuskelly 2004), (McDermott et al. 1999), psychiatric disabilities (Cook 2000), etc. Nosek and her colleagues (2001a, 2001b, 2001c) focused on sexuality of women with disabilities and other authors have focused on sexuality and disability in general. Very little research has been conducted on the comfort of rehabilitation professionals when discussing sexuality with people with disabilities. Often, research focuses on the rehabilitation team which often does not include rehabilitation counselors (RCs), but instead includes medical professionals. A gap exists in the literature regarding RCs when working with clients with disabilities on the topic of sexuality. RCs have direct contact counseling clients with disabilities on a multitude of topics, many of which are directly related to sexuality. Sexuality has been linked to self-esteem and body esteem as well as relationships, all of which are related to quality of life, the RCs main focus. RCs, who solely work with people with disabilities, should be prepared to discuss sexuality with clients. Previous studies have shown in other professions that training on sexuality increases a professionals knowledge and comfort in discussing sexuality, it is important to see if this holds true for the RC profession. The purpose of this study is to see if a relationship exists between the intensity of training on topics of sexuality a RC student receives during their training and how that factor correlates with their comfort in discussing sexuality with their clients.